Alright. If the whole point of your post was to say "Nemesis Mask is bad, but might make a good tale" then, sure.
I think anyone who manages to find their way to this corner of the internet is going to know that Nemesis Mask is a bad card. It takes a certain kind of person to google Nemesis Mask with specific enough terms to lead them here in the first place.
This isn't necessarily true. I mentioned Glissa the Traitor because she recurs Nemesis Mask (and has Deathtouch, and First Strike, both of which are very good in combat which Nemesis Mask forces).2. Playing Nemesis Mask is a bad decision. The card is not the strongest version of that effect available. If you are going to build your deck in such a way that you want that effect (which is also probably a bad decision), you probably want to play a bunch of other cards to accomplish that before you look at Nemesis Mask.
My point here is that there are different metrics by which one can judge a card, and you've clearly locked into mana investment being the primary one (rather than resilience, in the case of Glissa).
I do care what your opinion is. But, if you think Nemesis Mask and Lure effects in general are not the kind of game you want to play or won't do anything in your environment, it's nothing to me. The discussion should probably surround the idea of how you could use it, rather than about how you hate lure effects and think they suck. The former might be useful to someone, the latter is you just crapping on something.Look, if you don't care what other peoples opinions are, why are you reading a thread that's designed for people to post and discuss their opinions?? You do care. We all do.
I don't care that you don't want to play the card. I do care about whether you're going to provide a useful application for it, even if that application is unlikely to happen in your environment. One of these is constructive and the other isn't, and I would rather constructive discussion.