I would recommend asking them if you should invest in cards on the Commander ban list. :troll:
Too soon?
I would recommend asking them if you should invest in cards on the Commander ban list. :troll:
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.
It should be in the first weekend of August (read it somewhere on r/magicTCG)Dragonlover wrote: ↑4 years agoSo what's the C19 preview date? I'm assuming Maro did actually announce it last night?
Dragonlover
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.
I figure it's because on mtgsally it's something you "like", while here you're saying "thank you". To some people (many?), these are different meanings and that can lead to less use because of how we perceive it naturally. i.e. I can like something I might not thank you for, or I can thank you for something I may not like.NoNeedToBragoBoutIt wrote: ↑4 years agoBtw, why is it that only few board users are using the thank option?
I'm using it very pro-actively, especially when i feel like i can't contribute a useful reply, yet want to aknowledge a post/thought.
I'd be glad to see the same from everyone else, as it would diminish the feeling of shouting into the abyss at times. But with the visibility of thanks given i'm more under the impression it's used just as scarcely as it was on Sally.
Esper. Have to have a dash of blue due to the pursuit of knowledge.TearsOfTomorrow wrote: ↑4 years agoHey guys, help me out with a matter of flavor in a D&D game I'm playing. See, my character is a brooding, jaded, snarky private detective, who is prone to monologues that are meant as a parody of the film noir genre. Now, if such a guy had to be portrayed in terms of Mtg mana, what color would he be? He is of lawful alignment, so I was considering Orzhov, white for lawful and black for cynical. Thoughts?
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.
I concur, to me it's either Orzhov for the specific alignment to law that guild has or Esper for the reasons above.cryogen wrote: ↑4 years agoEsper. Have to have a dash of blue due to the pursuit of knowledge.TearsOfTomorrow wrote: ↑4 years agoHey guys, help me out with a matter of flavor in a D&D game I'm playing. See, my character is a brooding, jaded, snarky private detective, who is prone to monologues that are meant as a parody of the film noir genre. Now, if such a guy had to be portrayed in terms of Mtg mana, what color would he be? He is of lawful alignment, so I was considering Orzhov, white for lawful and black for cynical. Thoughts?
I never got into these. I tried the first and it was just a bit too cute for me. Sort of read like a Sookie Stackhouse novel, which isn't the worst thing ever, but I found it a little disappointing. Maybe they get better though. For now Joe Abercrombie is my jam, on the last book of the First Law trilogy at present.bobthefunny wrote: ↑4 years agohttp://epicstream.com/news/JakeVyper/Dr ... -is-Coming
About time!
(next Dresden Files book is complete)
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.
They are definitely a bit more out there. They seem to start within a constraint of rules and set up an interesting kind of fantasy detective genre... but then the author lets you know that this is still absolutely light hearted and not to be taken seriously, and shatters whatever suspense of disbelief you have. But it all ends up in good fun.toctheyounger wrote: ↑4 years agoI never got into these. I tried the first and it was just a bit too cute for me. Sort of read like a Sookie Stackhouse novel, which isn't the worst thing ever, but I found it a little disappointing. Maybe they get better though. For now Joe Abercrombie is my jam, on the last book of the First Law trilogy at present.bobthefunny wrote: ↑4 years agohttp://epicstream.com/news/JakeVyper/Dr ... -is-Coming
About time!
(next Dresden Files book is complete)
Yeah, I got that pretty casual vibe. I guess I just wasn't in the mood for it at the time.bobthefunny wrote: ↑4 years agoThey are definitely a bit more out there. They seem to start within a constraint of rules and set up an interesting kind of fantasy detective genre... but then the author lets you know that this is still absolutely light hearted and not to be taken seriously, and shatters whatever suspense of disbelief you have. But it all ends up in good fun.toctheyounger wrote: ↑4 years agoI never got into these. I tried the first and it was just a bit too cute for me. Sort of read like a Sookie Stackhouse novel, which isn't the worst thing ever, but I found it a little disappointing. Maybe they get better though. For now Joe Abercrombie is my jam, on the last book of the First Law trilogy at present.bobthefunny wrote: ↑4 years agohttp://epicstream.com/news/JakeVyper/Dr ... -is-Coming
About time!
(next Dresden Files book is complete)
Any specific books of his to recommend? I'd be willing to try one.
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.
Mine will be 'A pioneering retro-evangelist on a crusade to bring back the 70's'