!["Image" "Image"](https://i.imgur.com/PimxyK0.png)
The "or enchantment" part is confusing. Is this meant to make auras fall off or something? Strange.
Oh yeah and the previously leaked Banishing Light reprint.
The wording on the gods and the wording on this are basically the same. They both turn the object into "not a creature". There isn't any significant interaction since they are both doing the same thing. It is just that this card doesn't have any conditions on it so it will always turn it into "not a creature" regardless of Devotion.
I mean they could have gone with an Animate Dead-style wording, but I think we can all agree that that would have been too wordy.JovialJovian wrote: ↑4 years ago"or Enchantment" is because it turns the permanent into an enchantment, so the enchant clause still needs to be legal.
That's big news and really nice to know. : )CommanderMaster999 wrote: ↑4 years agoWait a second don't you guys recognize it
https://img.scryfall.com/cards/large/fr ... image.jpeg
I was right some of the cards from mystery booster test cards may become real deal someday in future sets
Ok Recycla-bird that's probably gonna get a Real deal in Ikoria and probably how the keyword counters work on the set
Nope. Those cards still require that the aura be enchanting a legal object *before* they are on said object. If it isn't already a creature or enchantment, and you try to move this onto it, it just won't move.darrenhabib wrote: ↑4 years agoCan somebody clarify rules, if you can or cannot use Simic Guildmage or Glamer Spinners to move this Aura onto a non-creature, non-enchantment permanents? WizardMN if you're about you'll know
If this is the case, what would happen if a planeswalker got enchanted? It still has the abilities, but I'm guessing that it needs to be a planeswalker to know how to use the abilities anyway?