[Official] State of Modern Thread (B&R 07/13/2020)
Community Rules
‖ Modern Rules
"Next B&R Announcement: October 21, 2019"
Emry is a problem and it seems they are going to correct it or at least give themselves a window of opportunity if needed. The next few weeks are going to be determining. With the Loothing ban they said they want the game to shift from the graveyard to the battlefied and Emry has done exactly the opposite. I am already seeing people maining 4 Leyline of the Void again.
Emry is a problem and it seems they are going to correct it or at least give themselves a window of opportunity if needed. The next few weeks are going to be determining. With the Loothing ban they said they want the game to shift from the graveyard to the battlefied and Emry has done exactly the opposite. I am already seeing people maining 4 Leyline of the Void again.
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
YM1R, only little sidenote... People didn't stopped playing lantern becausee it was bad, they stopped becazse they jumped to the next better mox opal deck and this was Kci. And Kci player didn't stopped because it was bad, they get a ban and now a lot of this player base still plays mox opal decks with urza. I knew some of them and they all evolved same way, lantern, Kci,urza... So lantern didn't dyed, it was only not the most busted mox deck anymore and this is dangerous because even lantern was to much degenerated for a lot of people
There is about 0% chance that we will see another Modern ban is such sort time. It is pretty clear that the banning will be aimed towards standard and the menace that is Field of the Dead. I don't know where do you see people maining 4 Leyline of the Void, but definitely not on the 5-0 lists and the successful tournament lists.iTaLenTZ wrote: ↑4 years ago"Next B&R Announcement: October 21, 2019"
Emry is a problem and it seems they are going to correct it or at least give themselves a window of opportunity if needed. The next few weeks are going to be determining. With the Loothing ban they said they want the game to shift from the graveyard to the battlefied and Emry has done exactly the opposite. I am already seeing people maining 4 Leyline of the Void again.
That's only partially true though. Lantern plays a lot differently than Urza decks and wins in different ways. At the same time, people still play other Mox decks like Affinity and Hardened Scales, so not everyone is just jumping on what is considered the best mox opal deck. Also, saying that Lantern was the most busted mox opal deck might be true, but it clearly wasn't the most busted deck in modern, hence it still exists just fine. KCI was the only broken deck, which was clear from its win ration, and the namesake card was banned for it. Is Urza ultimately a busted deck? Maybe, maybe not, we literally just don't know yet.Mtgthewary wrote: ↑4 years agoYM1R, only little sidenote... People didn't stopped playing lantern becausee it was bad, they stopped becazse they jumped to the next better mox opal deck and this was Kci. And Kci player didn't stopped because it was bad, they get a ban and now a lot of this player base still plays mox opal decks with urza. I knew some of them and they all evolved same way, lantern, Kci,urza... So lantern didn't dyed, it was only not the most busted mox deck anymore and this is dangerous because even lantern was to much degenerated for a lot of people
Counter, draw a card.
- ModernDefector
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: xe /xim
Literally happened this year lol.Ym1r wrote: ↑4 years agoYeeeeah that's completely unrealistic and completely unjustified. For one, they would never go for 4 bans within a yearModernDefector wrote: ↑4 years agoWhat's everyone's predictions for future bannings in the shltshow that is Modren?
Mine: Within six months, Opal and Urza banned. Within a year, Ancient Stirrings and/or Once Upon a Time banned.
And two years ago.
And two years before that.
If Once Upon A Time could justify a ban in your book, then I don't look forward to the boring %$#% show modern will become when we end up playing 60 basic lands vs 60 basic lands.ModernDefector wrote: ↑4 years agoLiterally happened this year lol.Ym1r wrote: ↑4 years agoYeeeeah that's completely unrealistic and completely unjustified. For one, they would never go for 4 bans within a yearModernDefector wrote: ↑4 years agoWhat's everyone's predictions for future bannings in the shltshow that is Modren?
Mine: Within six months, Opal and Urza banned. Within a year, Ancient Stirrings and/or Once Upon a Time banned.
And two years ago.
And two years before that.
Does anybody here actually have fun playing Modern or Magic in general? It sure doesn't seem like it. I for one really enjoy it, but I "only" play at FNM level, so I guess my argument is invalid here.
-
cfusionpm With that on the stack...
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
I have a really busy work schedule and a little baby at home, so my time to play paper is limited to maybe one FNM a month these days. With that in mind, the natural, wildly swinging variance between possible deck matchups can make for some pretty awful evenings or pretty amazing ones, depending on what my opponent is doing. So my paper experiences are super hit and miss, and the "misses" often make me question why I play in paper at all anymore.
But online, I can readily play for free and not have any negative recourse for conceding a terrible game/match. I can also immediately jump into another instead of waiting 20+ minutes for the next round to start. Transitioning to MTGO has done wonders for me loving Modern, but it's mostly because I avoid a lot of the truly awful things that define the competitive format.
Magic in General? Not really. Limited is not for me. Standard was ruined by War of the Spark and I never went back. Legacy is too rich, Vintage doesnt exist to me, and EDH is cool, but I dont have the time for it.
Modern? I played it, a lot. I sleeved up a fun miracles deck (fun to me, Terminus is a dumb card) and Mystic Sanctuary is exactly the kind of card I like.
Most Modern decks however? No. I dont enjoy playing against them. Prior to the looting ban, even PRE-Hogaak, I found Modern unbearable to play for over a year.
I dont know how it is now, but the last time Modern was great, to me, was the unbanning of Jace/BBE, because we could play UWR with a straight face.
Maybe Modern is ok now, I dont know. I'm playing WoW Classic. :p
- ModernDefector
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: xe /xim
Prediction ≠ preferenceSimto wrote: ↑4 years agoIf Once Upon A Time could justify a ban in your book, then I don't look forward to the boring %$#% show modern will become when we end up playing 60 basic lands vs 60 basic lands.
-
The Fluff Le fou, c'est moi
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
- Location: Gradius Home World
- Contact:
thanks for the feedback on mystic sanctuary. Guess I should get a few copies too. Might be useful in my , don't have cryptics, but I do have plenty of instant and sorcery that can be recurred by the land.Arkmer wrote: ↑4 years agoThe only one I've tried is a single Mystic Sanctuary and it has been good enough to want to keep. However, it isn't card advantage if you're looping Cryptics, it creates a fake card density. The Cryptic loop really put my opponents on edge a few games. They know that their spells are more finite than mine and their tempo is falling behind with it. However, having extra ways to draw cards is pretty important if you're going to further your own tempo through it all. Basically felt like a soft lock that also locks you to an extent as well.
Haven't used any of the castles yet. They just don't seem to want to fit in 3 color decks with all the other lands. Least not comfortably.
AnimEVO 2020 - EFZ Tournament (english commentary) // Clearing 4 domain with Qiqi
want to play a control deck in modern, but don't have Jace or snapcaster? please come visit us at the Emeria thread
- motleyslayer
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Contact:
I'm interested to see why they moved the next B and R to the 21st, I personally think the format is fine right now but maybe they have other plans
It could simply be that they want to have more B&R announcements to prevent another Hogaak Hoedown. They don't have to act on every B&R announcement, but Hogaak was a pretty good example of what happens when there aren't enough. There could be a hidden agenda, but I'd rather have more announcements than less
-
FoodChainGoblins Level 47
- Posts: 900
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: Riverside
Most likely just Field of the Dead in Standard, but they may be looking into Modern and especially Pauper from what I hear.motleyslayer wrote: ↑4 years agoI'm interested to see why they moved the next B and R to the 21st, I personally think the format is fine right now but maybe they have other plans
Standard - Will pick up what's good when paper starts
Pre Modern - Do not own anymore
Pioneer - DEAD
Modern - Jund Sacrifice, Amulet, Elementals, Trollementals, BR Asmo/Goryo's, Yawmoth Chord
Legacy - No more cards, will rebuy Sneak Show when I can
Limited - Will start when paper starts
Commander - Nope
Pre Modern - Do not own anymore
Pioneer - DEAD
Modern - Jund Sacrifice, Amulet, Elementals, Trollementals, BR Asmo/Goryo's, Yawmoth Chord
Legacy - No more cards, will rebuy Sneak Show when I can
Limited - Will start when paper starts
Commander - Nope
They're not really Mox Opal decks though, they mostly Urza and his trinkets. As for T1 add Shadow decks, UW and Infect. I'd add that mill has been an extremely good choice and got even better with Drown and Sanctuary.gkourou wrote: ↑4 years agoMy deck was Jeskai control for years. I thought that SFM being around(not in the deck) and looting ban would make it a lot more playable, but it's just a tier 2/3 deck still. Modern is still too brutal of a format to play with cute Jeskai control decks with electrolyze (which I love) and even if I don't have the time to play those days (it will surely come around), I will try to play with Amulet Titan one month from now, when I will have some free time.
Modern is just going mox opal and big mana as it seems and toolbox/small creatures are going down b/c of W6 & Plague engineer. Two reasons I don't like the new Modern era. At this point, I am willing to say that there are at least 2-3 cards that could easily come off the BL and make no impact.
Oh, I also watched the new PO, Emry, Ascendancy deck going off at turn 3-4 multiple times and taking 5 times to win.
So, the tier 1 of Modern is now, Tron, Mox Opal(PO, Whirza, PO with Ascendansy), Burn, Dredge, Amulet Titan and maybe Dredge? That does not sound any good, if true.
It's after the Standard Mythic championship, so they moved it up in case Golos/Field of the Dead decks dominate the event.motleyslayer wrote: ↑4 years agoI'm interested to see why they moved the next B and R to the 21st, I personally think the format is fine right now but maybe they have other plans
The sad thing is Emry would probably have been fine without affinity. Now she just comes too soon and does too much. On stream I am seeing people consistently win on turn 2-3. Emry is pretty much an ancient stirrings that also nullifies artifact removal. Also some play 8 moxes, that is more than the usual in even Vintage! The deck also gets to play 4 Engineered Explosives in the main without any downsides so its also very hard to pressure these decks in the early game and reminds me of KCI. I simply don't see Emry staying legal for 3 months.
Edit: Its still new and people need to catch up and receive the memo. A turn 1 Emry is guaranteed when you play 8 Moxes, 4 EE, 4 Bauble. Your opponent now has 1 turn to deal with Emry or its game over. You might not even lose on the spot but you will be put so far behind there is no reasonable coming back from it. Only Lightning Bolt, Path to Exile and Push+fetch can deal with it. Even if you somehow manage to deal with Emry the deck has other aces. Urza, Paradoxical Outcome and Jeskai Ascendancy. They have so many cantrips it will be easy for them to find another Emry or just flood you with their other threats.
Chalice on 0 or Leyline of the Void seem the only viable hate.
Edit: Its still new and people need to catch up and receive the memo. A turn 1 Emry is guaranteed when you play 8 Moxes, 4 EE, 4 Bauble. Your opponent now has 1 turn to deal with Emry or its game over. You might not even lose on the spot but you will be put so far behind there is no reasonable coming back from it. Only Lightning Bolt, Path to Exile and Push+fetch can deal with it. Even if you somehow manage to deal with Emry the deck has other aces. Urza, Paradoxical Outcome and Jeskai Ascendancy. They have so many cantrips it will be easy for them to find another Emry or just flood you with their other threats.
Chalice on 0 or Leyline of the Void seem the only viable hate.
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
Scg indi started with urza. Turn 1 he played 5 permanents, turn 2 emry and outcome drawing 5485 cards... This is gg. If we see this more this and next week, it will sure banned too something and not only standard next time. Turn 3 he had 14 permanents in play and opponent stoneforge, lol
I guess I would be sort of surprised if they gave something in Whirza Outcome the axe, but if it's starting to show its power and gaining momentum... I don't know, tough call. If I'm 50/50, I assume WotC is no change for Modern, lol.
- ktkenshinx
- Posts: 571
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: West Coast
- Contact:
Quoted for emphasis. If Hogaak didn't get Wizards to emergency ban something, I doubt any Modern scenario in the future ever will. I can see some Standard scenarios resulting in emergency bans, just because of the blistering tempo of format evolution/gameplay due to Arena/MTGO/paper tournaments (and Standard being the flagship format). But if Hogaak Summer didn't do it, an era where Hogaak was a 100% foregone ban before it ruined three major GP, then nothing is realistically going to reach that bar. Decks may and likely will still see bans in the future, but they will be at normally scheduled intervals.
I agree this is likely a response to Standard. Between MTGO/MTGA, paper events, MC5, and other major events, Wizards will have a significant dataset to draw metagame conclusions from. If a card like Field is hurting their flagship format with a new set release thrown in, something is going to get banned. I suspect Modern isn't currently on their radar at all. We don't have an individual GP until November and I don't remember a time where Wizards banned something without both GP and PT/MC data to back it up. The closest was GGT, which had few T8 performances when banned, but that still happened after a string of GP where Dredge did put up results.FoodChainGoblins wrote: ↑4 years agoMost likely just Field of the Dead in Standard, but they may be looking into Modern and especially Pauper from what I hear.motleyslayer wrote: ↑4 years agoI'm interested to see why they moved the next B and R to the 21st, I personally think the format is fine right now but maybe they have other plans
As usual, cherrypicked examples of powerful Modern decks doing broken lines have never been a good argument to ban a card/deck. It's extremely easy and misleading to reduce a Modern deck to its most broken line and call for a ban based on that scenario. Thankfully, Wizards does not operate this way. Instead, Wizards looks at a deck's overall format impact and overall performance metrics over thousands of games gathered on MTGO. With no individual GP until November and the focus squarely on Standard, I suspect we don't see any changes until at least late 2019.Mtgthewary wrote: ↑4 years agoScg indi started with urza. Turn 1 he played 5 permanents, turn 2 emry and outcome drawing 5485 cards... This is gg. If we see this more this and next week, it will sure banned too something and not only standard next time. Turn 3 he had 14 permanents in play and opponent stoneforge, lol
Re: Whirza/Emry/Opal/etc.
On the one hand, early signs point to some iteration of this deck being the best thing you can do in Modern. This was clear in Hogaak Summer, when all the performance metrics pointed to Whirza variants being the best thing even with Hogaak around, and it's clear now. Like I said a few days ago, it's the secretly-not-so-secretly best deck in the format and you should probably be playing it. All of that generally points to a deck being bannable.
On the other hand, we have really bad data in Modern right now and minimal incentive to brew/iterate/evolve. Pro attention is on Standard. Most players are digging deep into MTGA and its Standard offerings. There aren't major Modern events until November, and Team Events naturally warp towards perceived best decks. All of this suggests we don't actually know what the "true" best decks are, and we don't have enough datapoints to draw strong conclusions. This blunts my own earlier assessment of the deck above and suggests it might be much more aligned with everything else top-tier Modern decks are doing. Personally, I'm in a clear wait-and-see position until we get more reliable numbers.
Over-Extended/Modern Since 2010
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
I sayed if we see this more this week and next... I didn't say ban it because I watched it one time, so it is not cherry picking
-
cfusionpm With that on the stack...
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
On an unrelated-to-Urza note, MTGO prices are usually a good indicator of relative power/strength of a card. I went to sell the rest of my MTGO Stoneforges yesterday and saw that they dropped allll the way back to their pre-unban price. That pretty much confirms everything I thought about the strength of the card. Paper price will continue to stay high, because that's what always happens (remember how Ancestral Vision was $50 for more than a year?! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: )
- ktkenshinx
- Posts: 571
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: West Coast
- Contact:
We could see that line on camera 10 weeks in a row and it wouldn't make the deck or any card bannable. The most important elements that go into a ban decision are T8 prevalence, MTGO prevalence, and win rates. Egregious on-camera performances can be indicators of larger problems, but board states in single, highly visible games are really not relevant for ban decisions.Mtgthewary wrote: ↑4 years agoI sayed if we see this more this week and next... I didn't say ban it because I watched it one time, so it is not cherry picking
Over-Extended/Modern Since 2010
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
If we see a deck often on camera and if it is broken on camera... So it is a indicator, believe it or not. We saw last week a lot of boring standard field games on cam all day long and some days after they changed the ban announcement, so please it's absolutely wrong believing you can do this 10 weeks in a row. No you can't, it's important. Community will pressure this... Thousands of people week after week watching it can't be ignored.
-
cfusionpm With that on the stack...
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Watching this Titan/Urza match just solidifies how divided the power levels are between "tier 1" and "tier2" decks. These decks people say are 'viable' are orders of magnitude weaker than the shenanigans happening on camera at the SCG Open right now.
Edit: In addition to raw power level and perceived strength, looks like post ELD builds of Urza are now creating logistics problems....
Edit: In addition to raw power level and perceived strength, looks like post ELD builds of Urza are now creating logistics problems....
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
Cfusion this is what I ment, you can't show this week after week if community pressure grows because of this games on cam
-
cfusionpm With that on the stack...
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Community pressure is literally all we have right now, too. We have no meaningful GPs for months and MTGO data is either actively hidden or purposely skewed to misrepresent the format. When decks keep having nutso performances on camera, it draws attention, and enough of that attention (backed by secret data we don't have access to) could persuade WOTC to act.Mtgthewary wrote: ↑4 years agoCfusion this is what I ment, you can't show this week after week if community pressure grows because of this games on cam
- ktkenshinx
- Posts: 571
- Joined: 5 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: West Coast
- Contact:
I said it could be an indicator. Key word being "could." We aren't going to know until we have more compelling datapoints and better events. Viewers aren't really a great indicator of format health, especially when the viewing statistics can be warped through relatively basic technical tricks (e.g. embedding). A better and more reliable indicator of health is attendance, but even there, it's so complicated to analyze attendance due to the many involved factors. This is why the best indicator is still T8s at major events (we don't have any for a while), MTGO standings (which are admittedly opaque), and win rates (also opaque).Mtgthewary wrote: ↑4 years agoIf we see a deck often on camera and if it is broken on camera... So it is a indicator, believe it or not. We saw last week a lot of boring standard field games on cam all day long and some days after they changed the ban announcement, so please it's absolutely wrong believing you can do this 10 weeks in a row. No you can't, it's important. Community will pressure this... Thousands of people week after week watching it can't be ignored.
In the absence of those datapoints, the correct approach is not to pretend like alternate datapoints are just as good. It's to acknowledge our current datapoints are, at best, limited and, at worst, suck. The correct posture now is to wait and see, not fall into the Modern alarmism we're seeing on Reddit, Twitter, Twitch, and elsewhere.
In the past, you have rightfully noted SCG events are not necessarily (or even often) representative of the larger metagame. I believe it was you who once called them "glorified FNMs," and I largely agree with that characterization in many metagames. I am unwilling to make any conclusions about the health of the format based on SCG Opens or non-GP/non-aggregated MTGO events. SCG Opens can certainly represent the larger metagame, but it's by no means a rule and requires other corroborating points.
Logistical problems are definitely an issue and are also one of the few issues that we can likely translate from an SCG Open into a larger GP. It only takes literally one player to cause them, and if it's happening at Opens, it could happen at later events. I'd put that in the orange flag category, given that it's only one event so far.Edit: In addition to raw power level and perceived strength, looks like post ELD builds of Urza are now creating logistics problems....
Over-Extended/Modern Since 2010