Rules headache
Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 2:11 pm
Tried to come up with the most abstract card I could imagine and well...
Magic Rules Compendium Vol. I
World Enchantment - Aura
( in a mana cost is payed by activating a non-intrisic abilities. Those abilities have no effect.)
Enchant stack
Players may choose not to resolve spells they control. Their controller may have those spells remain unresolved on the stack for as long as Magic Rules Compendium Vol. I is on the battlefield.
When announcing spells and abilities, and as players pass priority between steps and phases, unresolved spells on the the stack are treated as though they don't exist.
Whenever a player chooses targets as part of casting a spell, that player may choose to have any number of unresolved spells on the stack become that spell, as long as all spells have a single target. (It's no longer that spell. It's every other unresolved spell with a single target.)
My earlier version remained on the stack as well enchanting the stack from the stack.
Since this an obvious rules nightmare my only question is, did I cover my bases enough with this template that it can pass off as "functional"?
Magic Rules Compendium Vol. I
World Enchantment - Aura
( in a mana cost is payed by activating a non-intrisic abilities. Those abilities have no effect.)
Enchant stack
Players may choose not to resolve spells they control. Their controller may have those spells remain unresolved on the stack for as long as Magic Rules Compendium Vol. I is on the battlefield.
When announcing spells and abilities, and as players pass priority between steps and phases, unresolved spells on the the stack are treated as though they don't exist.
Whenever a player chooses targets as part of casting a spell, that player may choose to have any number of unresolved spells on the stack become that spell, as long as all spells have a single target. (It's no longer that spell. It's every other unresolved spell with a single target.)
My earlier version remained on the stack as well enchanting the stack from the stack.
Since this an obvious rules nightmare my only question is, did I cover my bases enough with this template that it can pass off as "functional"?