MTGNexus

Posted: **Tue Sep 01, 2020 6:30 pm**

Link

The four missing ones are coming "Very Soon".

Maro's Tumblr wrote:
bunsenburn asked:

Why is there six new pathways, as opposed to the usual cycle of 5 dual lands? Why are they a mix of ally and enemy? Will we see the missing four in another set later this year? As a player who plays a deck not in those colors, it is annoying to be left out from this powerful dual cycle, especially when I can't just say "oh my deck is ally colored and these are enemy colored".

The other four are coming very soon. : )

Posted: **Tue Sep 01, 2020 8:15 pm**

Uh, four? Shouldn't there be 14 more, to go in both directions?

Edit: Then again, it probably doesn't matter, given the way these cards work, and that both sides are lands.

Posted: **Tue Sep 01, 2020 8:52 pm**

Ok, good. I was wondering about that.

MTGNexus

[ZNR] Info regarding the "missing" parts of the new dual cycle, from MaRo himself.

[ZNR] Info regarding the "missing" parts of the new dual cycle, from MaRo himself.

Re: [ZNR] Info regarding the "missing" parts of the new dual cycle, from MaRo himself.

Re: [ZNR] Info regarding the "missing" parts of the new dual cycle, from MaRo himself.