Re: Your deck sucks (review request thread)
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 5:54 pm
Okay Pokken Do your worst: My Unspeakable List You cant cause me more emotional damage than this deck causes when i play it.
Magic the Gathering Resources, Tools, Previews, and Community.
https://www.mtgnexus.com/
Don't tell me how to roast decks and I won't tell you how to ruin the internet with your decklistmaterpillar wrote: ↑1 year agoviewtopic.php?f=35&t=23919
My Esika, God of the Tree // The Prismatic Bridge deck. It's an Esika deck not a Prismatic Bridge deck. Esika is cast turn 3 every game, the bridge is cast maybe 1/4 of the games on turn 7, The last game I played, I lost because the mana curve was too low, so don't "Oh your mana curve is so bad" me. It needs to be worse. I have a foil Mindshrieker that's why I don't play Keruga, the Macrosage. If you tell me to play Eldrazi, I'll tell you that you suck worse than your reviews.
Wow this is an interesting heap. 9 mana commanders that generate one very bad card a turn are pretty problematic in the year 2011 so I'll be reviewing this from the perspective of an early commander player.Ulka wrote: ↑1 year agoOkay Pokken Do your worst: My Unspeakable List You cant cause me more emotional damage than this deck causes when i play it.
Finally, a deck that would fit in with my time traveling writing partner from 2011. Now this deck can close a game and doesn't waste too much time doing things in the early game except cycling Krosan Tusker as Dr. Garfield intended.materpillar wrote: ↑1 year agoviewtopic.php?f=35&t=23919
My Esika, God of the Tree // The Prismatic Bridge deck. It's an Esika deck not a Prismatic Bridge deck. Esika is cast turn 3 every game, the bridge is cast maybe 1/4 of the games on turn 7, The last game I played, I lost because the mana curve was too low, so don't "Oh your mana curve is so bad" me. It needs to be worse. I have a foil Mindshrieker that's why I don't play Keruga, the Macrosage. If you tell me to play Eldrazi, I'll tell you that you suck worse than your reviews.
Absolutely nailed it for 2011 Commander. I feel personally attacked by all of the above statementspokken wrote: ↑1 year ago
I'll be reviewing this from the perspective of an early commander player.
But I'll tell you some other things because my Rofellos, Llanowar Emissary deck has never lost to this piece of crap. It's turn three and I windmill slam a Primeval Titan
No one plays Flying Men they will be too quickly outclassed by cards like Tarmogoyf.
I would also definitely be playing Thran Dynamo and Worn Powerstone if you ever want to cast your commander on time.
This deck might be better off getting rid of all these bad cards and just playing more good stuff like Staff of Nin and Stroke of Genius.
I also don't know anyone playing Rhystic Study. Everyone will just pay for it and you won't get any cards. Trash!!
Editors note: please read bolded section before reporting. They asked for it.
Lol I recently put one into my Raphael, Fiendish Savior deck but adding lifelink and +1/+1 gives him a weird Baneslayer Angel kind of angle on top of his tutor. It probably still doesn't make him great but I found your comment funny enough to mention that I had non ironically put one in a deck recently. I still don't have sufficient testing to say if he works there or not though.
On a less trolly note (I know its the point of the thread) but I think you might want a little more vigilance. Enabling Kefnet to function as both offense and defense can be huge forcing opponents to try to go wide or combo against you which blue has a lot of answers to. Akroma's Memorial, Batterskull, Minamo, School at Water's Edge, and Avarice Amulet to name a few options. When Kefnet can also clobber the biggest attacker it really forces opponents to go wide to attack you while you slowly bludgeon them to death.
I was just thinking if you slapped +1 and lifelink on practically any 9 mana creature it'd be overpowered so maybe you're right.ISBPathfinder wrote: ↑1 year agoLol I recently put one into my Raphael, Fiendish Savior deck but adding lifelink and +1/+1 gives him a weird Baneslayer Angel kind of angle on top of his tutor. It probably still doesn't make him great but I found your comment funny enough to mention that I had non ironically put one in a deck recently. I still don't have sufficient testing to say if he works there or not though.
It was also really spooky in that day because clones were EVERYWHERE not to mention Bribery. I can't tell you how scared I was to see someone cast a rune-scarred for the next player to chain 3x clones on him tutoring more clones from the clones lol. I got to the point that I refused to play rune scarred without a sac outlet and someone playing a clone was my que to immediately axe murder him.pokken wrote: ↑1 year agoI was just thinking if you slapped +1 and lifelink on practically any 9 mana creature it'd be overpowered so maybe you're right.ISBPathfinder wrote: ↑1 year agoLol I recently put one into my Raphael, Fiendish Savior deck but adding lifelink and +1/+1 gives him a weird Baneslayer Angel kind of angle on top of his tutor. It probably still doesn't make him great but I found your comment funny enough to mention that I had non ironically put one in a deck recently. I still don't have sufficient testing to say if he works there or not though.
More seriously rscd is fine if you're animating it or cheating it out the card is just very 2013 lol. Man we played a lot of that dummy back in the day.
God I miss the old Legend rules for this purpose alone.ISBPathfinder wrote: ↑1 year agoIt was also really spooky in that day because clones were EVERYWHERE not to mention Bribery. I can't tell you how scared I was to see someone cast a rune-scarred for the next player to chain 3x clones on him tutoring more clones from the clones lol. I got to the point that I refused to play rune scarred without a sac outlet and someone playing a clone was my que to immediately axe murder him.pokken wrote: ↑1 year agoI was just thinking if you slapped +1 and lifelink on practically any 9 mana creature it'd be overpowered so maybe you're right.ISBPathfinder wrote: ↑1 year ago
Lol I recently put one into my Raphael, Fiendish Savior deck but adding lifelink and +1/+1 gives him a weird Baneslayer Angel kind of angle on top of his tutor. It probably still doesn't make him great but I found your comment funny enough to mention that I had non ironically put one in a deck recently. I still don't have sufficient testing to say if he works there or not though.
More seriously rscd is fine if you're animating it or cheating it out the card is just very 2013 lol. Man we played a lot of that dummy back in the day.
Have I mentioned how happy I am that clones are like 1/3 as good as they used to be?
Don't get me started on tuck. That %$#% was amazing and I wish it was still a thing or if you do tuck it adds an additional cost to put into the command zone. I know its very off topic but god it helped balance the overly commander centric focus that I feel the format has evolved into. but thats my 2 cents and not its time to watch Pokken rip a new list to shreds.
This abomination is next.materpillar wrote: ↑1 year agoReaders Note: I think I'm going to change Esika's deck title from "worst mana curve possible" to "the power of hope". Man that was hilarious.
Another?![]()
![]()
viewtopic.php?f=35&t=32887
Your 2011 author should love this one. It's the first EDH deck I ever built. I even have the first list I posted to mtgsalvation for comparison. It's basically nostalgia the deck for me full to the brim with suboptimal cards that are mostly in there for the art and because angels are cool. As Garfield intended.
And I'm so glad I did; that was amazing. Thank you 😁
This had me howling! What a good start to a Friday.