Selfish and baseless suggestion: Errata Brother's Yamazaki to have partner

onering
Posts: 1233
Joined: 4 years ago
Answers: 1
Pronoun: Unlisted

Post by onering » 3 years ago

There is no precedent for doing this, but dammit it sure makes sense. Now that Sak is available, giving the Brothers partner lets you run one with Sak and finally build the deck. Is this something that WotC should do? Yes. Do I nevertheless selfishly want the RC to do it for the fun? Yes.

User avatar
cryogen
GΘΔ†
Posts: 1056
Joined: 4 years ago
Pronoun: he / him
Location: Westminster, MD
Contact:

Post by cryogen » 3 years ago

Rule 0, my friend.
Sheldon wrote:You're the reason we can't have nice things.

User avatar
RxPhantom
Fully Vaxxed, Baby!
Posts: 1513
Joined: 4 years ago
Pronoun: Unlisted
Location: Southern Maryland

Post by RxPhantom » 3 years ago

Dude. Just do it. I can't think of a table that would disallow it.
Can you name all of the creature types with at least 20 cards? Try my Sporcle Quiz! Last Updated: 2/18/22 (Kamigawa: Neon Dynasty)

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Rules and Philosophy”