November 18 Banned & Restricted Announcement (Oko Banned)
Community Rules
‖ Forum rules
-
void_nothing Look On My Sash...
- Posts: 15073
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: Tal Terig, Zendikar
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/a ... nouncement
Standard: Oko, Thief of Crowns, Once Upon a Time, Veil of Summer are banned
Brawl: Oko, Thief of Crowns is banned
Legacy: Wrenn and Six is banned
Vintage: Narset, Parter of Veils is restricted
Standard: Oko, Thief of Crowns, Once Upon a Time, Veil of Summer are banned
Brawl: Oko, Thief of Crowns is banned
Legacy: Wrenn and Six is banned
Vintage: Narset, Parter of Veils is restricted
Psst, check the second page of Custom Card Contests & Games! Because of the daily contests, a lot of games fall down to there.
The greatest (fake) pro wrestling on the internet - Collaborative Create-A-Booster - My random creations (updated regularly)
Important Facts: Colorless is not a color, Wastes is not a land type, Changeling is not a creature type
The greatest (fake) pro wrestling on the internet - Collaborative Create-A-Booster - My random creations (updated regularly)
Important Facts: Colorless is not a color, Wastes is not a land type, Changeling is not a creature type
Well...I think it's easy to see what the Pioneer B&R announcement could be including this afternoon
That shadowy wisp at the edge of your vision, there and gone before you notice.
Formerly Dusk707 on MtGSalvation
Formerly Dusk707 on MtGSalvation
-
void_nothing Look On My Sash...
- Posts: 15073
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: Tal Terig, Zendikar
Oh yes, the writing is on the wall. Veil of Summer is even ALREADY gone in Pioneer!
Psst, check the second page of Custom Card Contests & Games! Because of the daily contests, a lot of games fall down to there.
The greatest (fake) pro wrestling on the internet - Collaborative Create-A-Booster - My random creations (updated regularly)
Important Facts: Colorless is not a color, Wastes is not a land type, Changeling is not a creature type
The greatest (fake) pro wrestling on the internet - Collaborative Create-A-Booster - My random creations (updated regularly)
Important Facts: Colorless is not a color, Wastes is not a land type, Changeling is not a creature type
If I was working on Play Design, I would feel so ashamed at this announcement. I think the Standard bannings were a correct decision on their part, but to think Play Design was created precisely to avoid these issues… and now we have four cards banned in Standard. Talking about poor work.
Commander decks
Deck | Power |
---|---|
Inferno | 5 |
Devoured by Dragons | 5 |
Midnight Hunt | 6 |
Hidden Dragon | 6 |
Chaos Reigns | 6 |
Draconic Onslaught | 7 |
I have not read the article as a whole, but they did post this about play design on the mothership: https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/a ... 2019-11-18Maluko wrote: ↑4 years agoIf I was working on Play Design, I would feel so ashamed at this announcement. I think the Standard bannings were a correct decision on their part, but to think Play Design was created precisely to avoid these issues… and now we have four cards banned in Standard. Talking about poor work.
They admit that they missed the mark on Oko's power, and address other things. They recognize what happened and have learned. What will come from that, we will see. Also, I don't expect to see these lessons come into play in the next couple of sets. They say you learn more from failure than victory, so lets see what happens.
That shadowy wisp at the edge of your vision, there and gone before you notice.
Formerly Dusk707 on MtGSalvation
Formerly Dusk707 on MtGSalvation
So the play design article on the mothership makes me feel worse, not better.
So they are deliberately trying to power up standard, is a bit of a shaky concept. I get that they want cards that are relevant in more than a single format, but I'm not sure I agree with them that powerlevel misses are more egregious when the overall powerlevel of the format is low. I don't know that having a higher baseline makes the misses less problematic, especially since that higher baseline means you are likely missing even higher.
The complete lack of discussion on Once Upon a Time is surprising to me, as that seems like it should have been even more obviously a problematic design.
Th article reads like they think they have a good gameplan, they just fumbled a few things on execution. and I'm not sure that's the case. I can't remember ever seeing a format with 65+% of the pro tour on the same deck (with minor variations). They banned a card, everything got significantly worse, and they had to ban 3!! more. That's not a minor miss. Missing the Saheeli Rai - Felidar Guardian combo was a minor thing; an understandable oversight. This feels major.
The only good thing about the article was the mention of Teferi, Time Raveler - it's good that they know how problematic and dangerous that guy is, even if he doesn't end up on the banlist.
So they are deliberately trying to power up standard, is a bit of a shaky concept. I get that they want cards that are relevant in more than a single format, but I'm not sure I agree with them that powerlevel misses are more egregious when the overall powerlevel of the format is low. I don't know that having a higher baseline makes the misses less problematic, especially since that higher baseline means you are likely missing even higher.
The complete lack of discussion on Once Upon a Time is surprising to me, as that seems like it should have been even more obviously a problematic design.
Th article reads like they think they have a good gameplan, they just fumbled a few things on execution. and I'm not sure that's the case. I can't remember ever seeing a format with 65+% of the pro tour on the same deck (with minor variations). They banned a card, everything got significantly worse, and they had to ban 3!! more. That's not a minor miss. Missing the Saheeli Rai - Felidar Guardian combo was a minor thing; an understandable oversight. This feels major.
The only good thing about the article was the mention of Teferi, Time Raveler - it's good that they know how problematic and dangerous that guy is, even if he doesn't end up on the banlist.
Often time it takes players (who spend more time on using cards than making cards) to see how powerful a card is. I wouldn't blame the designers for this.Maluko wrote: ↑4 years agoIf I was working on Play Design, I would feel so ashamed at this announcement. I think the Standard bannings were a correct decision on their part, but to think Play Design was created precisely to avoid these issues… and now we have four cards banned in Standard. Talking about poor work.
That said, I can finally pick up an Oko or two for my commander decks!
My issue is with how linear and easy setup these cards and shell were. Maybe they didnt think people would play Green? Its just kind of hard when you have the mana dork into Walker into counter protection (in green no less) into redraws. With a possible free refilter and a couple more pushed cards (nissa,krasis,teferi,fae tutor and the like) the deck builds itself and has a high win and consistency rate. Nobody in play design built this deck?
None the less it was mostly expected and only my newly pulled ext border OuaT will cry.......
None the less it was mostly expected and only my newly pulled ext border OuaT will cry.......
-
ISBPathfinder Bebopin
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: SD, USA
Of these I only pay attention to standard / brawl but I think these things all needed to happen. It just.......... needed to happen much sooner than it did. Hopefully it breathes some life back into the format because it was so completely horrible that it drove me to uninstall Arena.
Signature by Inkfox Aesthetics by Kelzam
-
vandertroll The Pontiac Bandit
- Posts: 201
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: he / him
- Location: Athens, GR
Haters gonna hate. Always finding something to complain about. To them, the set is either worthless and weak or overpowered with overpriced singles, the format is either stagnant or imbalanced. We can either have a safe, weak, boring game without risk of banning. Or we can have a novel, empowering, exciting game with risk of bannings. I choose the latter. WotC is doing an excellent job.
“Comboing in Commander is like dunking on a seven foot hoop.” – Dana Roach
“Making a deck that other people want to play against – that’s Commander.” – Gavin Duggan
"I want my brain to win games, not my cards." – Sheldon Menery
“Making a deck that other people want to play against – that’s Commander.” – Gavin Duggan
"I want my brain to win games, not my cards." – Sheldon Menery
- Pip_Maxwell
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
Farewell elks. You will be missed.
- SecretInfiltrator
- Posts: 5777
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: they / them
- Location: The Shattered Realm
I'm just happy to see that they are willing to ban a planeswalker in Standard rather than let it run wild just because they made the card type the face of the game.
Maybe they'll finally stop pushing them this far at some point.
Maybe they'll finally stop pushing them this far at some point.
-
RxPhantom Fully Vaxxed, Baby!
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: 4 years ago
- Pronoun: Unlisted
- Location: Southern Maryland
Taking a week or two off from bannings isn't exactly a fumble. Personally, I'm cashing out of Modern. Pioneer's existence alone is another signal that they're not willing to provide the necessary reprints to make Modern accessible. A c-note for a single land is asinine.
Can you name all of the creature types with at least 20 cards? Try my Sporcle Quiz! Last Updated: 2/18/22 (Kamigawa: Neon Dynasty)